|
Post by dcard666 on Oct 25, 2013 7:22:18 GMT -8
I would prefer 1-20 or 20-80 as well
|
|
|
Rules
Oct 26, 2013 7:42:18 GMT -8
Post by Kincl on Oct 26, 2013 7:42:18 GMT -8
While I hear your concerns, this is one issue where I just don't see the point in switching the rating systems. Sure, it may not be the one MLB scouts use, but quite frankly, their rating system is so general it makes it hard to compare players. 1-100 allows for much clearer player analysis and rewards diligent GMs.
|
|
|
Rules
Oct 26, 2013 8:04:44 GMT -8
Post by nypotence on Oct 26, 2013 8:04:44 GMT -8
It's not necessarily as a major or even minor issue it's just that I am willing to bet that most of the gms in this lg are more accustomed to a 1-20 scale or even a 20-80 scale, it's a matter of preference.
|
|
|
Rules
Oct 26, 2013 8:10:35 GMT -8
Post by nypotence on Oct 26, 2013 8:10:35 GMT -8
If it's a going to be a big hassle then by all means just ignore my the ratings change proposal
|
|
|
Rules
Oct 26, 2013 8:11:00 GMT -8
Post by danduke on Oct 26, 2013 8:11:00 GMT -8
Ya fuck math you guys. Srsly
|
|
|
Rules
Oct 29, 2013 5:26:03 GMT -8
Post by kevdav on Oct 29, 2013 5:26:03 GMT -8
I always use 1-100, not being a ML scout myself
|
|